Search for Indicators
All Data
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Calhoun
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adults who Binge Drink
County: Calhoun Adults who Binge Drink
17.7%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(17.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
39.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(26.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(38.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Annual Emergency Department Opioid Visits
County: Calhoun Annual Emergency Department Opioid Visits
207.0
Visits
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(370.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Annual Opioid Hospitalizations
County: Calhoun Annual Opioid Hospitalizations
20
Hospitalizations
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(19)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Calhoun Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
47.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(30.8)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(42.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Calhoun Death Rate due to Opioid-Related Drug Poisoning
County: Calhoun Death Rate due to Opioid-Related Drug Poisoning
40.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(25.3)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(36.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
59
Deaths
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(52)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Emergency Department Opioid Visits
County: Calhoun Emergency Department Opioid Visits
28.0
Visits
(July 2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(31.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
87.0%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(87.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
96.5%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(96.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun High School Students who Reported Using Heroin
County: Calhoun High School Students who Reported Using Heroin
0.0%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(0.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
72.2%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(74.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
4.5%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
2.4%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
3.1%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
89.7%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(91.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
96.4%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(96.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
61.2%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(69.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
7.2%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
4.1%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
5.3%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Opioid Prescriptions Dispensed
County: Calhoun Opioid Prescriptions Dispensed
891,091.7
Prescriptions per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Value
(663,067.3)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(9,002.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Teens who Binge Drink: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Calhoun Teens who Binge Drink: 9th, 11th Graders
9.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(11.2% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Teens who Use Marijuana: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Calhoun Teens who Use Marijuana: 9th, 11th Graders
14.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(21.6% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adults with Cancer
County: Calhoun Adults with Cancer
7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
18.6
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 61 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(20.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
179.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(160.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(179.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
14.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
48.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
19.8
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(18.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
County: Calhoun All Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun All Cancer Incidence Rate
458.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(438.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(452.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
131.7
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(122.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(124.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Cancer: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
County: Calhoun Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
82.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Colon Cancer Screening
County: Calhoun Colon Cancer Screening
77.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(75.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(77.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
County: Calhoun Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
75.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
36.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 81 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(35.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
66.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(59.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(71.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
County: Calhoun Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
73.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
County: Calhoun Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
49.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
11.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(11.8)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Pap Test in Past 3 Years
County: Calhoun Pap Test in Past 3 Years
79.1%
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
MI Value
(82.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(75.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
100.3
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.1)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(85.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / County Health Rankings
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Clinical Care Ranking
County: Calhoun Clinical Care Ranking
19
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
County: Calhoun Health Behaviors Ranking
County: Calhoun Health Behaviors Ranking
69
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
County: Calhoun Morbidity Ranking
County: Calhoun Morbidity Ranking
75
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
County: Calhoun Mortality Ranking
County: Calhoun Mortality Ranking
73
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
County: Calhoun Physical Environment Ranking
County: Calhoun Physical Environment Ranking
79
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
County: Calhoun Social and Economic Factors Ranking
County: Calhoun Social and Economic Factors Ranking
63
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
County: Calhoun
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adults with Diabetes
County: Calhoun Adults with Diabetes
11.9%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(12.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
37.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 65 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(26.1)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(39.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Diabetes: Medicare Population
27.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population
89.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(89.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
County: Calhoun Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
29.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Children with a Disability
County: Calhoun Children with a Disability
3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Calhoun Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with a Disability
County: Calhoun Persons with a Disability
14.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with a Disability
County: Calhoun Persons with a Disability
14.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Calhoun Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Calhoun Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Calhoun Persons with a Vision Difficulty
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Calhoun Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Family Planning
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
County: Calhoun Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
22.8
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(11.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Prior Value
(20.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Teen Pregnancy Rate
County: Calhoun Teen Pregnancy Rate
35.2
Pregnancies per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(21.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(32.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4)
County: Calhoun
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Calhoun Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
75.5%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(79.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care
County: Calhoun Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care
87.4%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(87.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(84.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(88.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
County: Calhoun Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
92.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(92.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(92.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Children with Health Insurance
County: Calhoun Children with Health Insurance
96.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(97.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(96.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Community Spending on Health Care
County: Calhoun Community Spending on Health Care
9.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
8.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Calhoun Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
143
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(141)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(142)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with Health Insurance
County: Calhoun Persons with Health Insurance
93.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(93.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Calhoun Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
County: Calhoun Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
51.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(54.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
County: Calhoun Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
25.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(25.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
2,737.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(3,261.0)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,967.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Calhoun Primary Care Provider Rate
58
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(78)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(59)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Households with an Internet Subscription
County: Calhoun Households with an Internet Subscription
87.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(88.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
County: Calhoun Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
91.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Calhoun Persons with an Internet Subscription
90.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(90.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: Calhoun Adults who Experienced a Stroke
3.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
County: Calhoun Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
7.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: Calhoun Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
79.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
52.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(44.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(48.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
52.0
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(48.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(51.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
208.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(205.9)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(194.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
32.3
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(30.8)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(40.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Cholesterol Test History
County: Calhoun Cholesterol Test History
85.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Heart Failure: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: Calhoun High Blood Pressure Prevalence
44.3%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
MI Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(32.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(40.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
County: Calhoun High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
County: Calhoun High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
37.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
63.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Hypertension: Medicare Population
66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination
75.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(67.8% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(66.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination
67.2%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(72.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(71.6% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(62.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
12.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(12.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
County: Calhoun COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
3.6
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(3.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
12.00
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(10.52)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.72)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
47.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(46.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Immunization Status of 19 to 35-Month-Old Children
County: Calhoun Immunization Status of 19 to 35-Month-Old Children
64.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(66.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(66.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Babies with Low Birthweight
County: Calhoun Babies with Low Birthweight
9.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Infant Mortality Rate: 3 year rate
County: Calhoun Infant Mortality Rate: 3 year rate
6.5
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(5.5 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(5.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Calhoun Infant Mortality Rate: 5 year rate
County: Calhoun Infant Mortality Rate: 5 year rate
5.7
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 53 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(5.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(6.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Calhoun Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
County: Calhoun Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
69.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(61.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy
County: Calhoun Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy
11.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(4.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(16.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)
County: Calhoun Mothers with Gestational Diabetes
County: Calhoun Mothers with Gestational Diabetes
8.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Mothers with Hypertension
County: Calhoun Mothers with Hypertension
14.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Preterm Births
County: Calhoun Preterm Births
10.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(10.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
County: Calhoun
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Calhoun Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
23.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
17.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 61 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(14.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(19.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Calhoun Depression: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Depression: Medicare Population
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun High School Students who Attempted Suicide
County: Calhoun High School Students who Attempted Suicide
10.9%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun High School Students who Felt Sad or Hopeless
County: Calhoun High School Students who Felt Sad or Hopeless
44.8%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(40.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun High School Students who Made a Suicide Plan
County: Calhoun High School Students who Made a Suicide Plan
16.6%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun High School Students who Seriously Considered Attempting Suicide
County: Calhoun High School Students who Seriously Considered Attempting Suicide
20.6%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
3.0%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Mental Health Provider Rate
County: Calhoun Mental Health Provider Rate
388
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(336)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(375)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Middle School Students who Attempted Suicide
County: Calhoun Middle School Students who Attempted Suicide
17.0%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(11.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Middle School Students who Felt Sad or Hopeless
County: Calhoun Middle School Students who Felt Sad or Hopeless
37.8%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(32.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Middle School Students who Made a Suicide Plan
County: Calhoun Middle School Students who Made a Suicide Plan
20.0%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
27.6%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(26.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
5.0%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
County: Calhoun Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
20.6%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Mortality Data
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Life Expectancy
County: Calhoun Life Expectancy
74.4
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(76.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Premature Death
County: Calhoun Premature Death
10,268.9
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 81 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(8,467.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Suicides
County: Calhoun Suicides
18
People
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(18)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
12.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
40.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
42.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Disability
33.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
13.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
13.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
45.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 79 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(34.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(32.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(46.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Oral Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
11.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Calhoun Adults who Visited a Dentist
60.4%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(56.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Adults with Major Tooth Loss
County: Calhoun Adults with Major Tooth Loss
21.6%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(23.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Dentist Rate
County: Calhoun Dentist Rate
72
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(80)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(70)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adults with Arthritis
County: Calhoun Adults with Arthritis
31.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Calhoun Adults with Kidney Disease
3.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
38.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adults who are Sedentary
County: Calhoun Adults who are Sedentary
28.0%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(22.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(23.4% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(29.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)
County: Calhoun Teens who Engage in Regular Physical Activity: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Calhoun Teens who Engage in Regular Physical Activity: 9th, 11th Graders
49.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(44.7% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(47.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
