Search for Indicators
Health Equity Dashboard
View all indicators that include breakout data by topics such as race/ethnicity, age and gender.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
County: Calhoun
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
39.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(26.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(38.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Annual Emergency Department Opioid Visits
County: Calhoun Annual Emergency Department Opioid Visits
207.0
Visits
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(370.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
59
Deaths
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(52)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
87.0%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(87.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
96.5%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(96.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
72.2%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(74.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
4.5%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
2.4%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
3.1%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
89.7%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(91.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
96.4%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(96.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
61.2%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(69.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
7.2%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
4.1%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
5.3%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Teens who Binge Drink: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Calhoun Teens who Binge Drink: 9th, 11th Graders
9.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(11.2% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Teens who Use Marijuana: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Calhoun Teens who Use Marijuana: 9th, 11th Graders
14.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(21.6% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
18.6
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 61 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(20.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
179.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(160.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(179.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
48.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
County: Calhoun All Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun All Cancer Incidence Rate
458.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(438.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(452.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
131.7
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(122.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(124.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Cancer: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
36.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 81 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(35.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
66.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(59.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(71.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
49.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
11.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(11.8)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
100.3
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.1)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(85.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Diabetes: Medicare Population
27.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Children with a Disability
County: Calhoun Children with a Disability
3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Calhoun Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with a Disability
County: Calhoun Persons with a Disability
14.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with a Disability
County: Calhoun Persons with a Disability
14.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Calhoun Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Calhoun Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Calhoun Persons with a Vision Difficulty
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Calhoun Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
County: Calhoun Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
92.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(92.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(92.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Community Spending on Health Care
County: Calhoun Community Spending on Health Care
9.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
8.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Persons with Health Insurance
County: Calhoun Persons with Health Insurance
93.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(93.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Calhoun Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
County: Calhoun Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
51.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(54.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
County: Calhoun Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
25.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(25.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
2,737.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(3,261.0)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,967.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Calhoun Persons with an Internet Subscription
90.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(90.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Calhoun Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
32.3
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(30.8)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(40.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Heart Failure: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
63.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Hypertension: Medicare Population
66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
47.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(46.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
County: Calhoun Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
69.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(61.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Depression: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Depression: Medicare Population
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun High School Students who Attempted Suicide
County: Calhoun High School Students who Attempted Suicide
10.9%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun High School Students who Felt Sad or Hopeless
County: Calhoun High School Students who Felt Sad or Hopeless
44.8%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(40.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun High School Students who Made a Suicide Plan
County: Calhoun High School Students who Made a Suicide Plan
16.6%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun High School Students who Seriously Considered Attempting Suicide
County: Calhoun High School Students who Seriously Considered Attempting Suicide
20.6%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
3.0%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Middle School Students who Attempted Suicide
County: Calhoun Middle School Students who Attempted Suicide
17.0%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(11.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Middle School Students who Felt Sad or Hopeless
County: Calhoun Middle School Students who Felt Sad or Hopeless
37.8%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(32.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Middle School Students who Made a Suicide Plan
County: Calhoun Middle School Students who Made a Suicide Plan
20.0%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
27.6%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(26.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
5.0%
Percent of Students
(2021-2022 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Mortality Data
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Life Expectancy
County: Calhoun Life Expectancy
74.4
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(76.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Premature Death
County: Calhoun Premature Death
10,268.9
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 81 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(8,467.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Calhoun Suicides
County: Calhoun Suicides
18
People
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(18)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
12.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Disability
33.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
13.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Calhoun Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
13.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
38.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Teens who Engage in Regular Physical Activity: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Calhoun Teens who Engage in Regular Physical Activity: 9th, 11th Graders
49.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(44.7% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(47.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun Asthma: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun COPD: Medicare Population
County: Calhoun COPD: Medicare Population
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Teens with Current Asthma
County: Calhoun Teens with Current Asthma
51.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(51.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun Chlamydia Incidence Rate
531
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 52 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(449)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(481.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Prior Value
(706)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: Calhoun Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
353
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Value
(234)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Prior Value
(351)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Tobacco Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
2.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(2.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Teens who Smoke: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Calhoun Teens who Smoke: 9th, 11th Graders
1.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(4.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(1.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Teens who Used E-cigarettes: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Calhoun Teens who Used E-cigarettes: 9th, 11th Graders
16.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(20.8% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(20.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Health / Weight Status
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Teens who are Obese: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Calhoun Teens who are Obese: 9th, 11th Graders
21.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(15.3% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Community / Demographics
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Veteran Population
County: Calhoun Veteran Population
7.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Domestic Violence Victims
County: Calhoun Domestic Violence Victims
1,471
Victims
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1,389)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Community / Transportation
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Community Spending on Transportation
County: Calhoun Community Spending on Transportation
18.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio
3.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Households without a Vehicle
County: Calhoun Households without a Vehicle
7.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Mean Travel Time to Work
County: Calhoun Mean Travel Time to Work
20.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(24.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
County: Calhoun Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
0.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
County: Calhoun Workers who Drive Alone to Work
County: Calhoun Workers who Drive Alone to Work
80.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(77.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Economy / Food Insecurity
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Community Spending on Food
County: Calhoun Community Spending on Food
13.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun
Economy / Housing & Homes
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Community Spending on Housing
County: Calhoun Community Spending on Housing
31.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Value
(31.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio
18.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Homeless Senior Population
County: Calhoun Homeless Senior Population
218
Seniors
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(161)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Homeless Veteran Population
County: Calhoun Homeless Veteran Population
127
Veterans
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(120)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio
16.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(16.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Overall Homeless Population
County: Calhoun Overall Homeless Population
862
People
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(732)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Overcrowded Households
County: Calhoun Overcrowded Households
1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
County: Calhoun Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
46.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
County: Calhoun Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio
7.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun
Economy / Income
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Median Household Income
County: Calhoun Median Household Income
$58,191
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
($68,505)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Per Capita Income
County: Calhoun Per Capita Income
$32,047
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
($37,929)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Economy / Poverty
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Calhoun Children Living Below Poverty Level
23.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Families Living Below Poverty Level
County: Calhoun Families Living Below Poverty Level
10.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
County: Calhoun People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
10.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
County: Calhoun People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
2,389
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun People Living Below Poverty Level
County: Calhoun People Living Below Poverty Level
14.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
County: Calhoun Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Calhoun Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
29.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Youth not in School or Working
County: Calhoun Youth not in School or Working
1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Day Care Center and Preschool Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun Day Care Center and Preschool Spending-to-Income Ratio
7.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Home Child Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun Home Child Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
3.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun
Education / Educational Attainment
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun College Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun College Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio
14.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun Community Spending on Education
County: Calhoun Community Spending on Education
1.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
County: Calhoun People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
22.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(31.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
County: Calhoun People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
91.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Calhoun Student Loan Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Calhoun Student Loan Spending-to-Income Ratio
5.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
2.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Calhoun
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Value
Compared to:
County: Calhoun Access to Parks
County: Calhoun Access to Parks
0.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
