Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Babies with Low Birthweight

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Babies with Low Birthweight

Value
Compared to:

Babies with Low Birthweight County: Calhoun

Current Value:

Babies with Low Birthweight County: Calhoun

9.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Calhoun has a value of 9.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (9.2%), Calhoun has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Calhoun has a value of 9.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Calhoun (9.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.9%).
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Calhoun value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Babies with Low Birthweight State: Michigan

Current Value:

Babies with Low Birthweight State: Michigan

9.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Michigan has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (9.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.2%).
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Infant Mortality Rate: 3 year rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Infant Mortality Rate: 3 year rate

Value
Compared to:

Infant Mortality Rate: 3 year rate County: Calhoun

Current Value:

Infant Mortality Rate: 3 year rate County: Calhoun

6.5
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (6.5), Calhoun has a value of 6.5.
MI Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.5), Calhoun has a value of 6.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.5 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Calhoun (6.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.1).
Prior Value
(5.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Calhoun value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Infant Mortality Rate: 3 year rate State: Michigan

Current Value:

Infant Mortality Rate: 3 year rate State: Michigan

6.5
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.5), Michigan has a value of 6.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.5 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (6.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5).
Prior Value
(6.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Infant Mortality Rate: 5 year rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Infant Mortality Rate: 5 year rate

Value
Compared to:

Infant Mortality Rate: 5 year rate County: Calhoun

Current Value:

Infant Mortality Rate: 5 year rate County: Calhoun

5.7
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Calhoun has a value of 5.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 53 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (6.5), Calhoun has a value of 5.7 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.4), Calhoun has a value of 5.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Calhoun (5.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5).
Prior Value
(6.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Calhoun value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Infant Mortality Rate: 5 year rate State: Michigan

Current Value:

Infant Mortality Rate: 5 year rate State: Michigan

6.5
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.4), Michigan has a value of 6.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (6.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.6).
Prior Value
(6.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Value
Compared to:

Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care County: Calhoun

Current Value:

Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care County: Calhoun

69.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Calhoun has a value of 69.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (76.3%), Calhoun has a value of 69.3% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Calhoun has a value of 69.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Calhoun (69.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (61.2%).
Prior Value
(61.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Calhoun value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care State: Michigan

Current Value:

Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care State: Michigan

76.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Michigan has a value of 76.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (76.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (74.1%).
Prior Value
(74.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care Census Place: Battle Creek

Current Value:

Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care Census Place: Battle Creek

70.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Battle Creek has a value of 70.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (76.3%), Battle Creek has a value of 70.8% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Battle Creek has a value of 70.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Battle Creek (70.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (69.5%).
Prior Value
(69.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Battle Creek value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy

Value
Compared to:

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy County: Calhoun

Current Value:

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy County: Calhoun

11.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Calhoun has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (8.5%), Calhoun has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), Calhoun has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Calhoun (11.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.9%).
Prior Value
(16.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Calhoun value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy State: Michigan

Current Value:

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy State: Michigan

8.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), Michigan has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (8.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy Census Place: Battle Creek

Current Value:

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy Census Place: Battle Creek

14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Battle Creek has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (8.5%), Battle Creek has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), Battle Creek has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Battle Creek (14.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.6%).
Prior Value
(19.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Battle Creek value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Mothers with Gestational Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Mothers with Gestational Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Mothers with Gestational Diabetes County: Calhoun

Current Value:

Mothers with Gestational Diabetes County: Calhoun

8.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (7.3%), Calhoun has a value of 8.4% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Calhoun (8.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.4%).
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Calhoun value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mothers with Gestational Diabetes State: Michigan

Current Value:

Mothers with Gestational Diabetes State: Michigan

7.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (7.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mothers with Gestational Diabetes Census Place: Battle Creek

Current Value:

Mothers with Gestational Diabetes Census Place: Battle Creek

7.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Calhoun, MI County Value (8.4%), Battle Creek has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
Calhoun, MI County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Calhoun County value.
Compared to the MI Value (7.3%), Battle Creek has a value of 7.9% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Battle Creek (7.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Battle Creek value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Mothers with Hypertension

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Mothers with Hypertension

Value
Compared to:

Mothers with Hypertension County: Calhoun

Current Value:

Mothers with Hypertension County: Calhoun

14.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (12.3%), Calhoun has a value of 14.8% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Calhoun (14.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.5%).
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Calhoun value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mothers with Hypertension State: Michigan

Current Value:

Mothers with Hypertension State: Michigan

12.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (12.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mothers with Hypertension Census Place: Battle Creek

Current Value:

Mothers with Hypertension Census Place: Battle Creek

14.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Calhoun, MI County Value (14.8%), Battle Creek has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
Calhoun, MI County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Calhoun County value.
Compared to the MI Value (12.3%), Battle Creek has a value of 14.7% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Battle Creek (14.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Battle Creek value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Preterm Births

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Preterm Births

Value
Compared to:

Preterm Births County: Calhoun

Current Value:

Preterm Births County: Calhoun

10.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Calhoun has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.6%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (10.4%), Calhoun has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), Calhoun has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Calhoun (10.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.2%).
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Calhoun value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

Preterm Births State: Michigan

Current Value:

Preterm Births State: Michigan

10.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), Michigan has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (10.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Value
Compared to:

Teen Birth Rate: 15-19 County: Calhoun

Current Value:

Teen Birth Rate: 15-19 County: Calhoun

22.8
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (11.5), Calhoun has a value of 22.8 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(11.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Calhoun has a value of 22.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Calhoun (22.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.1).
Prior Value
(20.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Calhoun value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Teen Birth Rate: 15-19 State: Michigan

Current Value:

Teen Birth Rate: 15-19 State: Michigan

11.5
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Michigan has a value of 11.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (11.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.2).
Prior Value
(12.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Teen Pregnancy Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Teen Pregnancy Rate

Value
Compared to:

Teen Pregnancy Rate County: Calhoun

Current Value:

Teen Pregnancy Rate County: Calhoun

35.2
Pregnancies per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Calhoun has a value of 35.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.9.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (21.2), Calhoun has a value of 35.2 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(21.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Calhoun (35.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (32.1).
Prior Value
(32.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Calhoun value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4)

Teen Pregnancy Rate State: Michigan

Current Value:

Teen Pregnancy Rate State: Michigan

21.2
Pregnancies per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (21.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.9).
Prior Value
(21.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4)
MiCalhoun